This FAQ provides clear, factual answers to common questions about methane emissions management for oil and gas operators. Use the navigation below to find answers to specific topics.
Methane emissions management is the systematic process of detecting, quantifying, reporting, and reducing methane releases from oil and gas operations. It encompasses leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs, continuous monitoring, regulatory compliance reporting, and operational workflows designed to minimize fugitive emissions and authorized vents.
Effective methane emissions management integrates data from multiple sources—satellites, aerial surveys, continuous monitors, OGI cameras, and SCADA systems—to provide operators with actionable visibility into their emissions profile.
Satellite methane detection accuracy varies by system and conditions. In a single-blind validation study published in Scientific Reports (2023), satellite teams correctly identified 71% of emissions ranging from 0.20 to 7.2 metric tons per hour. Three-quarters (75%) of quantified estimates fell within ±50% of actual values.
Purpose-built methane satellites like GHGSat have achieved quantification accuracy better than ±20% in controlled tests. However, detection thresholds vary: wide-area satellites like Sentinel-2 detected emissions as low as 1.4 metric tons per hour, while targeted systems can detect smaller releases.
Key limitations include cloud interference, revisit frequency (typically 7-16 days), and the intermittent nature of oil and gas emissions. Sites emit detectable methane in only about 16% of satellite observations on average.
A leak (fugitive emission) is an unintentional release of methane from equipment failure, seal degradation, or component malfunction. Leaks require repair.
A vent (process emission) is an authorized, intentional release of methane during normal operations, such as:
The distinction matters for compliance, reporting, and operational response. Detection systems that cannot differentiate between leaks and vents generate false positives, triggering unnecessary investigations of authorized activities.
False positive methane alerts occur when detection systems flag emissions that either do not exist or do not require action. Common causes include:
Research shows false positive rates range from 3% to 5.5% or higher in real environments in continuous monitoring systems. At scale, this translates to hundreds of unnecessary investigations per year.
The most effective strategies to reduce false positives include:
Operators implementing these strategies have achieved 30-40% reductions in unnecessary site visits.
Continuous methane monitoring uses permanently installed sensors to detect methane concentrations in real-time, 24/7. Unlike periodic surveys (quarterly OGI inspections), continuous monitoring provides persistent visibility into emissions.
Technologies include:
Continuous monitoring enables faster detection of intermittent emissions that periodic surveys might miss. The EPA has approved several continuous monitoring technologies using periodic screening techniques as alternative test methods under OOOOa/b regulations.
Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) uses specialized infrared cameras to visualize hydrocarbon gases that are invisible to the naked eye. OGI cameras detect the infrared absorption signature of methane and other gases, displaying leaks as visible plumes on screen.
OGI is the primary method for LDAR inspections under EPA regulations. Technicians survey equipment components with the camera, documenting any detected leaks for repair.
Advantages of OGI include real-time visualization, ability to scan large areas quickly, and no direct contact with equipment. Limitations include dependence on operator skill, wind conditions affecting plume visibility, and inability to quantify emission rates without additional measurements.
EPA Subpart W (40 CFR Part 98, Subpart W) is the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program rule that requires petroleum and natural gas facilities to report annual methane and CO2 emissions to the EPA.
Facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more of CO2 equivalent per year must report. Subpart W specifies calculation methodologies, emission factors, and reporting requirements for various source categories including:
Reports are submitted annually through the EPA's e-GGRT system. Reported data is publicly available through the EPA's Facility Level Information on GreenHouse gases Tool (FLIGHT).
2025 Update: In September 2025, EPA proposed delaying oil and gas sector reporting under Subpart W until reporting year 2034. Operators should monitor EPA announcements for final rulemaking on this proposed delay.
EPA OOOOb (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOOOb) establishes performance standards for methane emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed oil and gas facilities. Published in December 2023, OOOOb updated and strengthened requirements from previous OOOOa rules.
Key OOOOb requirements include:
OOOOb applies to facilities constructed or modified after December 6, 2022. Existing sources are covered under separate Emissions Guidelines (OOOOc).
2025 Update: In November 2025, EPA finalized an 18-month extension of compliance deadlines for several OOOOb/c provisions, including requirements for control devices, equipment leaks, storage vessels, process controllers, and covers/closed vent systems. State plan deadlines for existing sources under OOOOc were also extended. Operators should consult current EPA guidance for updated compliance timelines.
Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) requirements for oil and gas vary by regulation but generally include:
Federal (EPA OOOOa/b):
State regulations (e.g., Colorado, California, New Mexico) often impose stricter requirements:
Voluntary programs (MiQ, OGMP 2.0) may require more frequent monitoring and measurement-based verification to achieve certification.
Operators must comply with the most stringent applicable regulation in each jurisdiction.
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 established the Waste Emissions Charge (WEC), a fee on methane emissions from facilities that exceed specified thresholds. This was commonly called the "methane fee" or "methane tax."
Original fee schedule (as enacted):
Current Status - Repealed: On March 14, 2025, President Trump signed legislation disapproving the EPA's Waste Emissions Charge rule under the Congressional Review Act. In May 2025, EPA formally removed the WEC regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations. Congress also prohibited EPA from collecting the charge until 2034.
What this means for operators: Facilities are not required to submit WEC filings or pay the methane fee. However, the underlying statutory language in the IRA technically remains on the books. Future administrations could potentially reinstate implementing regulations, though this would require new rulemaking.
Bottom line: The federal methane fee is not currently in effect and operators face no imminent compliance obligations related to the WEC.
OGMP 2.0 (Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.0) is the flagship methane reporting framework of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It is the only comprehensive, measurement-based international reporting framework for the oil and gas sector.
Over 115 companies have committed to OGMP 2.0, including BP, Shell, TotalEnergies, Equinor, and Repsol. The framework establishes five reporting levels, with Level 5 ("Gold Standard") requiring reconciliation of source-level estimates with site-level measurements.
OGMP 2.0 is voluntary but increasingly important for:
OGMP 2.0 Gold Standard (Level 5) is the highest reporting tier in the OGMP 2.0 framework. Achieving Gold Standard requires:
Gold Standard certification signals to buyers, regulators, and investors that an operator's emissions data is based on actual measurements rather than estimates alone.
A measurement-informed inventory (MII) is an emissions inventory that incorporates direct measurement data rather than relying solely on emission factors and engineering calculations.
Traditional inventories use generic emission factors (e.g., "X kg methane per pneumatic device per year") multiplied by equipment counts. These factors may not reflect actual site conditions.
Measurement-informed inventories integrate:
The goal is to reconcile calculated estimates with measured values, improving accuracy and identifying discrepancies. OGMP 2.0 Level 5 requires measurement-informed inventories.
Achieving OGMP 2.0 Level 5 (Gold Standard) requires:
The process typically requires 12-18 months to establish baseline measurements and reconciliation procedures before achieving Level 5 status.
Reconciliation is the process of comparing and aligning two independent estimates of methane emissions:
Reconciliation identifies discrepancies between these approaches, which may indicate:
The goal is not to force agreement but to understand differences, improve accuracy, and build confidence in reported values. OGMP 2.0 Level 5 requires documented reconciliation with explanation of discrepancies.
The EPA Methane Super Emitter Program is a regulatory mechanism established under OOOOb that uses third-party remote sensing to identify large methane releases at oil and gas facilities.
How it works:
The program leverages existing satellite and aerial monitoring infrastructure to supplement traditional inspections.
2025 Update: In November 2025, EPA extended the Super Emitter Program implementation deadline by 18 months as part of the broader OOOOb/c compliance deadline extensions. Full implementation is now expected in mid-2028. Operators should monitor EPA guidance for updated timelines and third-party certification requirements.
A super emitter event is a methane release from an oil and gas facility with an emission rate of 100 kilograms per hour (kg/hr) or greater, as measured by certified third parties using EPA-approved remote sensing technology.
This threshold equals approximately:
Super emitter events typically result from:
Not all large emissions qualify. The release must be detected by a certified third party using approved technology and reported through the official program.
When you receive an EPA super emitter notification, you must:
Within 5 calendar days:
If emission confirmed:
If emission not found:
Recordkeeping:
Failure to respond within required timeframes may result in compliance violations.
Certified third-party notifiers are organizations approved by the EPA to submit super emitter detection data. Certification requires:
Current and potential certified notifiers include:
Third parties must maintain certification through ongoing quality assurance and may lose certification for submitting inaccurate data.
Industry estimates for field crew dispatches in oil and gas operations range from $150 to over $1,000 per visit, depending on:
The true cost often exceeds direct expenses when including:
For operations with frequent false positive alerts, unnecessary field crew dispatches can cost $250,000 to $500,000+ annually.
Strategies to reduce unnecessary site visits include:
Operators implementing these strategies have reduced site visits by 30-40% while maintaining or improving detection of actual leaks.
Alert fatigue occurs when personnel receive so many notifications that they become desensitized and may miss or delay response to real issues.
Causes:
Consequences:
Solutions:
A sensor-agnostic platform can ingest and normalize data from any detection technology regardless of manufacturer or data format. This means operators are not locked into a single vendor's hardware ecosystem.
Benefits include:
Sensor-agnostic platforms typically use standardized data models (such as OGC SensorThings API) to normalize diverse data formats into a common schema for analysis.
SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) integration connects emissions monitoring systems with operational data from process control systems.
Data available through SCADA integration:
Benefits for emissions management:
SCADA systems are not standardized across the industry, so integration requires customization for each operator's specific infrastructure and historian (PI System, CygNet, etc.).
The OGC SensorThings API is an open international standard developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium for connecting IoT sensing devices, data, and applications over the web.
Key features:
Benefits for oil and gas:
SensorUp developed the SensorThings API standard and uses it as the foundation for its data fabric architecture.
A data fabric is an integrated data architecture that provides unified access to data across disparate sources, formats, and locations.
For emissions management, a data fabric connects:
Benefits:
A data fabric eliminates manual data aggregation from spreadsheets and enables automated workflows from detection to work order to compliance report.
MiQ (Methane Intelligence) is an independent certification standard for natural gas based on methane emissions performance. MiQ grades gas on a scale from A (lowest emissions) to F (highest emissions).
Certification process:
Benefits:
MiQ certification requires measurement-based emissions data, not just emission factor calculations.
OGMP 2.0 and MiQ serve different but complementary purposes:
OGMP 2.0:
MiQ:
Many operators pursue both: OGMP 2.0 for reporting framework and stakeholder credibility, MiQ for market access and commercial differentiation.
Preparing for an emissions audit requires:
Data organization:
Documentation:
System readiness:
Common audit findings to avoid:
Automated emissions management systems with built-in audit trails significantly reduce audit preparation burden and findings.
Last updated: February 2026
Have a question not answered here? Contact us or request a meeting with our experts to discuss your specific situation.
Copyright © 2025 SensorUp Inc. All Rights Reserved
Follow Us On:
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=spacer}
